Why do TNA marks think the Knockouts are better than the Divas!?

Question

I always see TNA marks on here claiming TNA has the better Women's division. And are always complaining about how the Divas are talentless w hores. Really? Last time I checked the TNA released all their talented Knockouts like Awesome Kong, ODB, Alisha Flash etc. The Knockouts division revolves around 3 trailor trash talented hookers who can't wrestle, The Brautiful People. In my opinion WWE has the better in ring performers, Melina, Gail Kim, Natayla, Tamina, Jillian, Beth Pheonix, and Michelle McCool, plus really hot women like Layla, Maryse, Kelly Kelly and Tiffany. Melinas return and recent championship win is saving the Divas division from being
Ad bad as the Knockouts. Agree or Disagree?
Win is saving the division from being ad bad ad the Knockouts.

Answer 1

The Knockouts aren't better than the Divas. If ODB, Awesome Kong, Alissa Flash, and Gail Kim were there then they'd be better than them. Gail Kim, Natalya, Tamina, Melina, and Beth Phoenix are better than TBP and Angelina Love.

Answer 2

I Always Defended The Knockouts Division ..... BEFORE HOGAN'S RULE!



Since Then The Knockout's Division Has Deteriorated. Yes The BP Are Running The Knockout's Division But Velvet Sky Is A Talented Wrestler. Because She Is A Heel It Means She Can't Wrestle Like A Face Wrestles



However The Knockouts Has A Smaller Division And That's Why It Works. They Have Hamada, Wilde, Sky, Tara, Sarita



The Problem With WWE Is The Introduction Of The Diva's Title. The Diva's Division Was Great In Say.... 2004.

On Raw You Had Gail Kim, Victoria, Jazz, Trish, Molly Holly, Lita.

On Smackdown You Had The Eye Candy



Now You Have Beth Phoenix + Serina On Smackdown

Melina, Gail, Natalya And Tamina On Raw



WWE Needs To Get All The Eye Candy On Smackdown, Ditch The Diva's Title And Put All The Diva's Who Can Wrestle On Raw.



So Um Yeah, Neither Division Is As Good As It Was And Both Have Potential To Fix Them

Answer 3

It really depends on does wrestling fans prefer for the divas/knockouts to have looks, wrestling skills, or both.



Im really the type of wrestling fan, that when it comes down to female wrestling, Im a little on the looks and looks/wrestling skills.Mostly the looks/wrestling skills.When I say looks/wrestling skills, I mean divas like Melina, Gail Kim, Eve, Natalya, Angelina Love, Beth Phoenix, Michelle McCool, etc who are hot, but can actually wrestle.I also like the Bellas, Kelly Kelly, and Lacey Von Erich, but out of those 4, I think Kelly Kelly is actually improving and in 2 years time, she could be where Melina is today.

Answer 4

you clearly don't know what Mark means.

The knockouts can wrestle and put on good matches BUT Lacey and that really sucks and is sad a member of the great Von Erich Wrestling Family doesn't know how to wrestle.

TNA gets their knockouts from womens wrestling leagues like Shimmer. Shimmer doesn't hire crap. Sky came from Shimmer, yet you claim she can't wrestle.



The WWE is known for hiring models then trying to train them to be wrestlers.

Funny you mention Gail Kim. The WWE is holding her back. She sucks in the WWE compared to what she was doing in TNA, and even during her 1st run in the WWE when the WWE actual had talented wrestlers like Trish Stratus Mickie James, Victoria (Tara in TNA right now the mystery biker chick), Lita.



I have never seen a Diva bleed, or a diva ladder match, or a diva use a weapon that wasn't a pillow.

Answer 5

I think TNA Knockouts are better .

There are not just eye candy, but they can actually wrestle .

Vince is just an old pervert who justs adds any old whore from the corner . Angelina Love can actually wrestle . Velvet Sky can actually wrestle .

Layla ? No . Rosa Mendes ? No . The only WWE Divas that can wrestle are Beth Pheonix, Maryse, Melina, and Michelle McCool .

But WWE is complimented with the Diva's looking better than a bunch of the TNA Knockouts .

Answer 6

confident, the knockouts are extra effective wrestlers than the divas for each reason you merely reported. different than for some divas like Beth, Melina, & Mickie, the divas are actually not something yet glorified Playboy wannabes. The Knockouts rather get interior the ring and carry their very own in spite of the indisputable fact that and that i'm able to truly take a seat and watch one in each and every of their fits. i do no longer bear in recommendations the final time i ought to try this with a divas journey.

Answer 7

sure, the knockouts are greater effective wrestlers than the divas for each reason you basically reported. apart from some divas like Beth, Melina, & Mickie, the divas are no longer something yet glorified Playboy wannabes. The Knockouts somewhat get interior the hoop and carry their very own however and that i will somewhat take a seat and watch certainly one of their suits. i do no longer remember the final time i'd desire to try this with a divas tournament.

Answer 8

TNA Knockouts are better but that's not saying much anymore. The KO Division has been declining. From the firings of Awesome Kong and Alisha Flash to reducing their TV time and PPV time. The KO Tag Titles have lost its relevance.



The KO Division has, like you said, revolved around a few KO. Basically, it's in a state where it's like the Diva Division and that's just sad.

Answer 9

Of course TNA has a better women division,wtf are you watching?

Answer 10

because until Hogan arrived the KOs were FAR superior to the Divas

Answer 11

alot of ppl use the term mark so loosely, & i dont think yall know what it means



https://answersrip.com/question/index?qid=20100819160243AAk2805



Just posted a question asking if ppl would stop being biased & talking crap. but yes, the divas imo are better wrestlers for the most part, but just dont get enough TV time