Question:
Will newer tag teams in wrestling have the longevity of the teams in the past like Road Warriors or Dudley's?
Raiden
2010-08-14 16:00:42 UTC
Will the newer teams being created stay together long enough now days too be able to build their tag team for years,Instead of a few years and then split up so someone can go for singles titles?
Seven answers:
Y!A's Apex Predator
2010-08-14 16:20:28 UTC
I don't think so, I hope so with guys like Motor City Machine Guns and Beer Money and even Hart Dynasty out there I want them to last. TNA has a lot of good tag teams but WWE does not. The main reason is everyone wants a shot at the Heavyweight Championship and they are more prone to and more willing to turn to singles competition now than before. Before when you had Hardy boyz, Dudley's, and E&C their was pride in the division of tag team but now it's like guys are randomly paired up so they can keep the tag belts alive and once they lose it they are broken up. We need guys coming in with the mindset that they are a team and want to dominate the tag team division. WWE needs to give focus to the division. Before it was brothers coming in or best friends tagging together now it's more two random people like Jericho and Big Show or others like that just thrown together so they can get some credibility to the tag team belts but they split up immediately after losing the belts. I think WWE needs to give some prestige back into other divisions and not just the heavyweight title belts.
anonymous
2010-08-14 16:18:24 UTC
I think Kane and the Big Show should be perminate. Cryme Tyme was better because I actually liked their team. The Hart Dynasty should always be a team. The Usos should be a team. There should have been an ECW tag title while they still had the chance. The WWE needs to hire a bunch of people and have more tag titles. WWE Superstars needs to move to two hours long. It would be great if they had a two hour long Superstars. Then that coul lead to a WWE Superstars Tag Title. And they need to split the tag titles back up. I am sick of seeing Raw have the title forever. Curt Hawkins and Vance Archer need to be perminate, and the Dudebusters need to stay together. That would be a "more awesomer" tag division. I think that if people like Shad and JTG split up,one of them will get released like Shad did yesterday. This is very stupid.

What pissed me off the most this week was that WWE didn't even pay tibute to Lance Cade when he died. They put the news up on the website, but that was for two days. They could at least have Trevor Murdoch come back and give a speech.
TJanssen411
2010-08-14 16:55:57 UTC
I think about the only way we'd see another Super team, like LOD was in the 80's and the Dudleys were in the 90s... would be if a pair of Indy guys -- who would almost need to be Brothers, Friends since PreK or even Life partners -- would work their way up by establishing a regional fan base and climbing the ranks through smaller feds until they caught the eye of a TNA or ROH and either being the Face of their tag divisions or after a 5 year stint jump to WWE at which time they'd have to negotiate thei contract to be almost exclusively for a sustained Tag team program



as much as people like to blame Vince for breaking up tag teams, bear in mind that most guys get into wrestling to be Ric Flair or Hulk Hogan, not the Dudleys or LOD so it would take a very tight knit relationship for any tandem to stick together
anonymous
2016-11-16 09:21:37 UTC
the line Warriors who destroyed communities in Memphis Wrestling, Continental Wrestling, Georgia Championship Wrestling, Jim Crockett Promotions NWA, All Japan professional Wrestlnig, the yankee Wrestling Assiciation might ruin the Dudley Boyz. The Dudleys does no longer be attentive to what hit them. no longer merely might the line Warriors beat up bubba Ray Dudley and Devon Dudley, they may well be up vast Dick Dudley, sign guy Dudley, Dudley Dudley, Dances with Dudley, Joel Gertner and Spike Dudley. no person ought to touch the line Warriors during the 1980's.
Blitz Flannery
2010-08-14 16:03:46 UTC
WWE-wise, no. Because eventually management will want to split them up for marketing and sales purposes.

TNA-wise, a bit more of a chance, but less recognition due to being the smaller company. Still a good chance they could break the pair up for a 3 or 4 month feud, but could reunite.



Some guys just fit better as part of a tag team.
The Suplex Press
2010-08-14 16:08:32 UTC
uh plain and simple no. there gonna be good but not last as long as Dudleys Warriors or even DX which break up every once in awhile, but if you wanna count it theyve been together for 4 years now
?
2010-08-14 16:20:34 UTC
i doubt it wwe hasn't been focused on he tag team division lately.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...