both titles on the line, your feelings?

Question

What do you think about Orton vs Cena for both titles....

I hope this doesn't lead to the unification of the titles. At first I was all for it because having 2 best wrestlers is stupid but only if they do it the right way and that is keeping the world title and getting rid of the other belt. The World Title has so much history behind it and it should be wwe's number 1 and only world title. That won't happen though because they just made the new WWE logo title and there's no way Vince is going to get rid of it! They will throw out the world title and I hate that idea.

Also If WWE gives Cena the honor of being the first person to hold the new wwe title and world their idiots, If it was Orton they would just be handing it to an already big star as well but atleast Orton can take a bump. I don't like the idea for the match but I like Orton vs Cena the feud....

In my opinion Daniel Bryan should get the honor of holding both titles for the first time.

Answer 1

Well first off: You're an idiot for saying they should throw away the WWE Championship. The WWE Championship has been around since the '60s, while the other one was made only just over 10 years ago.



What I think of this: It could have been a good idea IF they did it like they did Vengeance in 2001: A 4-man tournament. If it was up to me, I would have made Daniel Bryan vs Randy Orton for the WWE Championship, John Cena vs Damien Sandow for the World Heavyweight Championship, and the winners could face each other in a TLC match later in the night.



However, while it may seem like a good idea to have just ONE World Championship, it gives a lot of other wrestlers no direction. The World Championship scene would be really over-crowded. We have guys like Dolph Ziggler and Damien Sandow who looked like they would become World Heavyweight Champions, but without it what are they going to do? Keep beating each other up in a series of Hardcore matches? And then we will only have one Money in the Bank match.



Another thing: Having a TLC match between Cena and Orton seems so meaningless. Maybe it made sense for them to have an I Quit match and a Hell in a Cell match, but the Iron Man match was supposed to end their rivalry. A TLC match doesn't seem like one step further. Another downside would be if Cena wins the championship then we'd have no World Championship on SmackDown. Ever since he became World Heavyweight Champion he hasn't been on SmackDown at all. So if he's designated to Raw, all champions will most likely follow suite.



My final thoughts: A Championship unification match is a good idea, but the champions shouldn't be anywhere near each other. My idea would have been Daniel Bryan vs John Cena, or even Daniel Bryan vs Damien Sandow. The only good I can see coming out of this is if Cena is Undisputed Champion until WrestleMania and CM Punk wins the Royal Rumble.

Answer 2

I like the idea of unification. The split came when Raw and Smackdown were split, and if you were drafted to Smackdown, you only wrestled on Smackdown and vice versa.



The two titles allowed each brand to have their own champ. Now that the brands are not longer split, and the same wrestlers appear on both, I think there should only be one champion.



I agree, DB should get the honor!

Answer 3

maybe, or maybe not, these are the four outcomes from the match. any of these four could happen



1. one person wins both and unfifies it

2. one person wis both but holds two at the same time

3. both men leavs tlc with the same title that they came in

4. both men leavs with world titles but maybe not that same one ( cena might be the wwe champ and orton the world)

Answer 4

Honesty I could care less, it's a match that I've seen a thousand times I could care less who wins anymore the whole storyline is just stupid.

Answer 5

Anyone but Cena is what I think.

Answer 6

Didn't Chris Jericho hold both titles at one time?